Archaezooological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site (Guizhou, South China)

icaz_paper_icon.jpg

All Titles

  • Archaezooological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site (Guizhou, South China)

Dublin Core

Title

Archaezooological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site (Guizhou, South China)

Subject

S5-4, Variability in human hunting behavior during Oxygen Isotope Stages (OIS) 3/4: implications for understanding modern human origins, poster

Description

Abstract:

Ma’anshan is a Paleolithic cave site in the Guizhou province of southern China. The total area of the excavations is ca. 48 m2, and the cultural deposit is divided into two layers representing the Chinese Late Paleolithic and the later part of the Early Paleolithic. The upper layer dates between 19,295 BP and 31,155 BP by the 14C AMS technique, and the lower layer is dated to around 53 ka BP by the U-Series technique. Thousands of bone fragments were recovered from the two layers, of which 4,358 pieces could be identified to macro-mammal taxon or mammal body size class and skeletal element. Bone surface modifications, species abundance, skeletal element representation, and mortality patterns were used to investigate patterns of prey selection and meat consumption by the hominins, including food transport and butchering practices. Interpretations of these data are strengthened by reference to experimental studies and ethnoarchaeological data. The archaeological data indicate that the later occupants of Ma’anshan Cave hunted mainly medium and small game, while the earlier occupants tended to prey upon larger animals. In the later period, hominins also made fuller use of the carcasses. The breadth of the meat diet also increases with time, due to the inclusion of small animals (bamboo rats and birds) in the diet of the later period. The differences between the two faunal assemblages are consistent with the chronologic boundary currently drawn between the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic ca. 30 ka BP-27 ka BP based on technological and other evidence. Together with the evidence of chronological dating, palaeoenvironment, polished bone tools, the micromammal and bird bones from the two cultural layers, this study proposes three hypotheses (climatic, cultural and demographic) that could explain these differences. While none of the hypotheses can be refuted completely by the available evidence, a combination of climate-driven and demographic (predator pressure) effects is most likely.

Authors:

ZHANG Yue1,2,3, STINER Mary C.4, DENNELL Robin5, ZHANG Shuangquan1,2 and GAO Xing1,2

Affiliations

1 Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044 China zhangyue@ivpp.ac.cn
2 Joint Laboratory of Human Evolution and Archaeometry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044 China
3 State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing 210008 China
4 School of Anthropology, P.O. Box 210030, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030 USA
5 Department of Archaeology, Northgate House, West Street, University of Sheffield, S1 4ET, UK

Creator

Zhang, Yue
Stiner, Mary C.
Dennell, Robin
Zhang, Shuangquan
Gao, Xing

Date

August 2010

Contribution Form

Online Submission

No

Document Item Type Metadata

Citation

Zhang, Yue, Stiner, Mary C., Dennell, Robin, Zhang, Shuangquan and Gao, Xing. "Archaezooological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site (Guizhou, South China)," in BoneCommons, Item #1674, http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/bonecommons/items/show/1674 (accessed February 7, 2012).

License

Creative Commons License