<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Commons Protocol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=85" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?p=85</link>
	<description>Archaeology, data sharing, digitally enabled research and education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:04:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Commons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ensuring the freedom to integrate &#8212; why we need an &#8220;open data&#8221; protocol</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?p=85&#038;cpage=1#comment-37716</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Commons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ensuring the freedom to integrate &#8212; why we need an &#8220;open data&#8221; protocol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?p=85#comment-37716</guid>
		<description>[...] Eric Kansa, Society for American Archaeology, Digital Data Interest Group (DDIG), on the legal issues: &#8220;Data sources are&#8230;highly global, and therefore subject to all sorts of legal jurisdictions and rules&#8230;The solution that Science Commons advocates is to essentially move all open science data repositories to a common legal baseline, which is basically the public domain. [Following the protocol, scientific] data repositories that want to be &#8216;open&#8217; [could] shape their terms of use, copyright, and other policies so their content is essentially public domain and freely remixable with other resources&#8230;Comment: Wow!&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eric Kansa, Society for American Archaeology, Digital Data Interest Group (DDIG), on the legal issues: &#8220;Data sources are&#8230;highly global, and therefore subject to all sorts of legal jurisdictions and rules&#8230;The solution that Science Commons advocates is to essentially move all open science data repositories to a common legal baseline, which is basically the public domain. [Following the protocol, scientific] data repositories that want to be &#8216;open&#8217; [could] shape their terms of use, copyright, and other policies so their content is essentially public domain and freely remixable with other resources&#8230;Comment: Wow!&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digging Digitally &#187; Short piece over at the &#8220;Ancient World Bloggers&#8221; Group</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?p=85&#038;cpage=1#comment-37560</link>
		<dc:creator>Digging Digitally &#187; Short piece over at the &#8220;Ancient World Bloggers&#8221; Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/blog/?p=85#comment-37560</guid>
		<description>[...] over at the Ancient World Bloggers group blog. It&#8217;s a critical examination of the Open Data Protocol announced by Science Commons.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at the Ancient World Bloggers group blog. It&#8217;s a critical examination of the Open Data Protocol announced by Science Commons.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
